Favorite Links
Archive
12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004
01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
11/01/2010 - 12/01/2010
BlogRoll
Syndicate this site
You Should Read Every Word They Write:
Donate
|
Friday, July 23, 2004The just-released 9/11 Commission Report is, among other things, further evidence of "big media's" longing for a Bush re-election defeat. Byron York nails the New York Times and Washington Post for their ludicrous headlines when the draft report came out a few weeks ago, (respectively) "Panel Finds No Qaeda-Iraq Tie" and "Al Qaeda-Hussein Link is Dismissed." The 9/11 Report details the contact between the two - that we're aware of - and the potential for future contact. In fact, Hussein had offered Bin Laden safe haven in Iraq. York goes on,With that background in mind, the reasoning employed by American policymakers in early 2002 as they planned the next step in the war on terrorism, comes into clearer focus. The U.S. had toppled the Taliban but had not caught bin Laden and some of his top aides. Without a friendly regime in Afghanistan to protect al Qaeda, where might bin Laden and his band of terrorists go next? One possibility — a quite reasonable possibility — would be a place that had offered them haven in the past: Iraq.Will there be apologies or corrections from the Post or the Times? You can guess. My pal Rich Lowry has a comment in his review of the Report from one of the Commission members: Republican commission member John Lehman blames Clarke's partisan testimony before the commission for the poisonous atmosphere of much of its public work. "We were mugged by Viacom," Lehman says of the company that owns the publisher of Clarke's book and CBS News, which gave Clarke's tome a huge send-off. "They edited his book to make it into an anti-Bush jihad."As an aside, I happened to hear these words out of Dan Rather's mouth on Tuesday's evening news, "Republican Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan ..." Good grief. There's no doubt in my mind that the print and television media giants have a horse in this race. I just wonder what impact they'll have when the candidates' advertising is silenced by campaign finance reform and the only voice we'll hear in the month before the election is the voice of big media. [Permalink] (0) comments
Comments:
Post a Comment
|
Contact Banterings
Add Us To Your Blogroll
Get Involved
|